Is it allowed for srand(0)
to have the same effect as srand(1)
?
C11, 7.22.2.2 The srand function (empahasis added):
The srand function uses the argument as a seed for a new sequence of pseudo-random numbers to be returned by subsequent calls to rand.
However, in glibc srand(0)
has the same effect as srand(1)
:
/* We must make sure the seed is not 0. Take arbitrarily 1 in this case. */
if (seed == 0)
seed = 1;
Hence, the same sequence of pseudo-random numbers is returned by subsequent calls to rand
, which is confusing.
Extra: We see that in MSVC srand(0)
does not have the same effect as srand(1)
.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire